Sunday, April 14, 2019
Should Creationism Essay Example for Free
 Should Creationism EssayThroughout the world, there is a debate  all over whether the  scheme of  organic evolution should be taught alongside the stories of Creation. In some states of America, Christian fundamentalists have succeeded in having the theory of evolution  forbidden from schools and colleges. This shows how far people to get what they believe is right. There are two Creation stories the P source, and the J source. The P source tells us the  theme of how God made the world in six old age whereas the J source shows God in a more hands on approach (in  equation to him creating things by commanding it to be so).    It tells the story of how God created Adam out of dust, and Eve out of  atomic number 53 of Adams ribs. They are put together in the Garden of Eden. The story of creation is the  just about popular story as evolution does appears to remove the need for a God in the  help of the creation of life.. People who are religious, (who believe in God) feel that they cann   ot believe the theory of evolution when it contradicts the story told by sources P and J. It does have some weaknesses though. It does not explain the presence of fossils or the geological  examine against this story.So called Creationists dismiss this because God may have panted the rocks as a test of faith. Those who believe in the story of Creation are known as Creationists. There are two main types of Creationists  orthodox and progressive. Conservative Creationists believe that the Genesis story is to be interpreted in a strictly  grownup way. Progressive Creationists take a more liberal interpretation of the Genesis account. They feel that they can  have got the fossil record through this interpretation. For example, the word day in Genesis 1 is taken to  attend to a more general period of time rather that 24 hours.During Charles Darwins famous  military expedition to the Galapagos Islands in 1839, Darwin noted that there were variations between animals on each island. Each gr   oup of animals appeared to have  fit to the conditions on their island. Darwin devised his theory of evolution to explain how these variations could have come about. This was a strong theory because it is  sanction up scientific evidence. It is widely known that animals adapt to their specific surroundings. It also explained something that before was just not known. There are also fossils that back this theory up.As with any theory, it has its sceptics. There are  umteen natural phenomenon such as cleaner  lean that evolution cannot explain. Cleaner  weight are fish that swim into larger fishes mouths and clean parasites and pieces of food out of their mouths. Instead of the larger fishes eating the small fish, we  appear calmly, and when finished they swim off to eat other small fish. Why would a little fish want to swim into the mouth of a big fish which usually eats little fish. This suggests that  soul Godlike designed these fish to  flow together in this way.Also some people  f   ind there is a fatal flaw in his findings. He said that all living things evolved over  more millions of years from the same ancestor, a tiny cell in the ocean. Because, although we can see many differences in the world of nature what we never see is any type of living thing  changing into something completely different. Darwin himself admitted there was no evidence for such big changes. Many scientists believe in this theory of evolution as it is commonly seen that animals can adapt. Also, Richard Dawkins created a new strain of Darwinism namely Neo-Darwinism.This introduces the concept of  haphazard genetic mutation either giving some advantage to the organism or not effecting the organism.  found from this evidence above, I think that Creationism should be taught alongside evolution as evolution is only a theory and children should not be forced into what to believe but choose themselves. Scientists are happy to work alongside the story of Creation so, even if you dont believe in    evolution, there is no reason why it should not be taught in schools. Obviously, if parents felt strongly, they should be able to withdraw their children from those lessons.  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.